Which of the following actions can result in five-year sanctions under FFD policy?

The action that leads to five-year sanctions under Fitness for Duty (FFD) policy is resigning before termination for a positive test. When an individual is found to have violated substance use policies, resigning prior to the formal termination process does not absolve them of the consequences associated with the violation. Instead, it can be seen as an attempt to evade accountability, which often results in more severe penalties, including extended sanctions.

In contrast, seeking help from an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is generally viewed as a proactive and positive step. It indicates an individual’s willingness to address potential substance abuse issues, which is typically encouraged by organizations. Consuming alcohol while off-duty is more nuanced; if not violating the organization's substance use policies or personal conduct standards, it may not result in sanctions. Lastly, reporting a colleague for unsafe behavior is an act of responsibility and safety awareness, and it is usually supported by policies aimed at maintaining a safe work environment. Therefore, resigning in the context of a positive test fundamentally undermines the integrity of the policies in place, resulting in significant consequences.